Every guide should include
- A direct answer near the beginning
- A facts table or comparison
- Best for and not ideal for guidance
- Author, reviewer and last editorial review
- Official or authoritative sources for important claims
- A page-specific next step, not a generic contact link
What counts as information gain
A page should help a traveler make a decision they could not make from a generic attraction list: how many days to protect, which transfer costs real time, who should not choose the route, where a weather or mobility trade-off appears and what fallback keeps the plan usable.
What counts as trust
We separate official facts from editorial judgment, show the source scope, expose date-sensitive assumptions and avoid guarantees about ticket inventory, opening hours, weather or travel outcomes. A visible uncertainty is more useful than a confident but unsupported promise.
Corrections and updates
Policy, entry, payment, transport and safety information can change. We record review dates, cite the relevant source and state the limits of what a page can guarantee. When a material error is found, the page should be corrected and the change reviewed.
AI-assisted work
AI may help with drafting or organization, but pages must not be published as bulk, interchangeable content. A responsible editor checks the sources, adds original route judgment and owns the update cycle.